Legal Opinion

State v. Perry

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 2004No. 2002-1792PublishedCited by 325 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

{¶ 1} The question presented in this ease is whether the failure of the trial court to maintain written jury instructions with the “papers of the case” in violation of R.C. 2945.10(G) is cause for the automatic reversal of a defendant’s conviction.

I

{¶ 2} On February 9, 2001, the Franklin County Grand Jury indicted defendant-appellee, Michael L. Perry, for kidnapping, cunnilingus rape, vaginal rape, and gross sexual imposition. Appellee pleaded not guilty and was tried in the *119Franklin County Court of Common Pleas. At the conclusion of the trial, the jury found Perry not guilty of vaginal rape…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by325 opinions

  1. State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. Henderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

320 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API