Legal Opinion
Pacific Gas and Electric Company v. Federal Power Commission, Sierra Pacific Power Company, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1958No. 15773PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.
Pacific Gas and Electric Company filed in this court a petition to review and set aside an order of the Federal Power Commission. Asserting that the petition has been filed in the wrong circuit, Sierra Pacific Power Company, inter-venor herein, has moved to dismiss the petition. Respondent, Federal Power Commission, has joined in the motion.
Disposition of this motion calls for consideration of the antecedent administrative and court proceedings involving these parties. On March 4, 1948, PG& E and Sierra entered into a contract under which PG&E sells to Sierra most of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Arkansas Natural Gas Co. v. Arkansas Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Ohio Oil Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Sierra Pacific Power Company v. Federal Power Commission, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- New York Central Railroad Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Pearce v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.