Legal Opinion

Crystal Pier Co. v. Schneider

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1919No. Civ. No. 2087PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an appeal from the judgment following an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. The action was to recover rents alleged to be due from defendants as lessees under a written lease executed to them by one McDonald, as lessor.

The ease as made by the complaint, in so far as is necessary to an understanding of the question presented, is as follows: McDonald, the original lessor, transferred the lease and the property therein described to the Hollister Avenue Pier Company, a California corporation. Thereafter the Hollister Avenue Pier Company forfeited its - charter for nonpayment of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Rossi v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Sharp v. LoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Matthews v. CapshawTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Feaster v. FaganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Tru Block Concrete Products, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1983
  2. Reagh v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Joseph v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
  4. Church v. ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Wolf v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API