Legal Opinion
Consolidated Edison Co. v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided February 21, 1949No. Claim No. 29000; Claim No. 29001; Claim No. 29002Published
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
The Attorney-General has moved to dismiss each of the above-entitled claims pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice upon the ground that it appears on the face thereof that the claim does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The motions were all returnable at the same time and as the cases are substantially similar, we shall consider them together.
Each claim arose out of transit commission case No. 2711 which provided for the elimination of grade crossings on the Atlantic Avenue Division of the Long Island Rail Road Company between East New York, borough of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Transit Commission v. Long Island RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Lewis v. . New York Harlem R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- New York City Tunnel Authority v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Mirro v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.