Legal Opinion

Automotion Tech, Inc. v. Scott Vance; Scott Vance v. TT21 Smart Repair Services, Inc.; Scott Vance v. Adam Dioguardi

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 29, 2026No. 2:25-cv-12081Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION AUTOMOTION TECH, INC., Plaintiff/ Counter-Defendant, v. Case No. 25-cv-12081 HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH SCOTT VANCE, Defendant/ Counter-Plaintiff, v. TT21 SMART REPAIR SERVICES, INC., and ADAM DIOGUARDI Counter-Defendants. ____________________________________/ OPINION & ORDER DENYING COUNTER-DEFENDANTS’ ADAM DIOGUARDI, AUTOMOTION TECH INC., AND TT21 SMART REPAIR SERVICES INC.’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS (Dkts. 23, 24, 25) Counter-Plaintiff Scott Vance brings this action against Counter-Defendants Automotion Tech, Inc. (AMT),…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. American Greetings Corporation v. Gerald A. CohnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  5. Frank v. Dana Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API