Legal Opinion
United States v. Lindgren
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided May 1, 1995No. Civ. A3-95-4PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
WEBB, Chief Judge.
1. BACKGROUND:
The United States, through the Attorney General, brought this action under the recently enacted Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (“FACE”). 18 U.S.C. § 248 (1994). The United States alleges the defendants violated FACE during their anti-abortion efforts relating to the Fargo Women’s Health Organization (“FWHO”) facility in Fargo, North Dakota. The Complaint seeks damages, civil penalties, and injunctive relief.
The United States filed a motion for a preliminary injunction (Docket No. 4). The court received…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Calvin Klein Cosmetics Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Lenox Laboratories, Inc., Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
3Cited by9 opinions
- Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Anne C. Lotierzo v. A Woman's World Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Alaw (P. Mahoney)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- United States v. WhiteDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1995
- United States v. GreggDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.