Legal Opinion
Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. v. Rushton (In Re Rushton)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided August 21, 2002No. 14-20831PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOHN S. DALIS, Chief Judge.
Conseco Finance Servicing Corporation (hereinafter “Conseco”) by motion seeks to vacate this Court’s order disallowing its claim for $12,094.44. James and Dorothy Rushton (hereinafter “Debtors”) oppose Conseco’s motion. Conseco asserts that service of Debtors’ objection was improper because Debtors failed to send notice to Conseco’s counsel as per its request for notices. Because Debtors failed to serve their objection in accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 7004(b)(3) 1 , Conseco’s motion is granted and my earlier determination at hearing in Debtor’s favor is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ms. Interpret v. Rawe Druck—Und—Veredlungs—GmbH (In Re Ms. Interpret)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Boykin v. Marriott International, Inc. (In Re Boykin)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- Schwab v. Associates Commercial Corp. (In Re C.V.H. Transport, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Fleet Credit Card Services, L.P. v. Tudor (In Re Tudor)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2002
- In Re Lomas Financial Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 1997
3Cited by10 opinions
- Moglia v. Lowitz & Sons (In Re Outboard Marine Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Jorgenson v. State Line Hotel, Inc. (In Re State Line Hotel, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- In Re AndersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
- Litton Loan Servicing, L.L.P. v. Eads (In Re Eads)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas · 2009
- In Re WilkinsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.