Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Anderson

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas

Decided September 7, 2005No. 05-30161PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON AMENDED MOTION TO VACATE ORDER ON DEBTORS’ OBJECTION TO PROOF OF CLAIM OF CITIFINANCIAL MORTGAGE COMPANY PURSUANT TO FRCP 59(b) AND 60(b)

JEFF BOHM, Bankruptcy Judge.

I.INTRODUCTION

The Court has decided to issue this Memorandum Opinion to emphasize its concern over the all-too-frequent practice among some consumer creditors’ attorneys — perhaps at the insistence of clients intent on drastically minimizing their fees and expenses — that they can expect the Court to accept allegations in pleadings as sworn testimony and therefore need not bring any witnesses to hearings or…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Michigan v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Rogers v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re ParsleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
  2. In re BradleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  3. In Re WilkinsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2011
  4. Rainey v. Davenport (In Re Davenport)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
  5. In Re HensleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API