Legal Opinion

Pierce v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 8, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This is an action of tort at common law to recover compensation for damage to the plaintiff’s motor truck resulting from a collision with a railroad car alleged to have been negligently operated by the defendant. The collision occurred in the afternoon of May 16, 1947, on the premises of the Boston Sand & Gravel Company in the Dorchester district of Boston, at a point where a side or spur track of the defendant entered from the north. The defendant was backing into the premises a “cement” car of the “hopper-bottom ” type to deliver a load of cement. An employee of the plaintiff had driven the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fortune v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. Query v. HoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Klegerman v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Kenney v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Creeley v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Borden v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  2. Fay v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. Holmes v. New York Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  4. McLucas v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API