Legal Opinion
In re M.O.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 6, 2018No. 28828PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as In re M.O.,
2018-Ohio-2176.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) IN RE: M.O. C.A. No. 28828 APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF SUMMIT, OHIO CASE No. DN 15-02-120 DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY Dated: June 6, 2018 HENSAL, Judge. {¶1} Appellant Father appeals the judgment of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, that issued a judgment entry nunc pro tunc regarding visitation. For the following reasons, this Court affirms. I. {¶2} Mother and Father are the biological parents of M.O.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State ex rel. Fogle v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- State v. McClaffertyOhio Court of Appeals · 2020