Legal Opinion

People v. Brown

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1997No. Docket 191823, 191824PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

The prosecutor appeals by leave granted the trial court’s quashing of the information charging defendants with gross indecency between females, MCL 750.338a; MSA 28.570(1). We reverse and remand.

i

Defendants were employees of the Loving Touch massage parlor in the City of Femdale. The parlor was suspected by the police to be a front for prostitution. In October 1991, an undercover officer patronized the parlor as part of an investigation. The officer was quoted a price for a massage with two women of *588his choice. The officer paid the quoted price and selected defendants. Defendants took the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. ThomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. LinoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. LinoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. VronkoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Leo Ricardo Barnes v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
  3. People v. LintMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. People v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API