Legal Opinion · Dissent

Exxon Corp. v. Hunt

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 10, 1986No. 84-978Published

1DissentJustice Stevens

The purposes of the “Spill Fund” Act passed by the New Jersey Legislature in 1977,1 and the “Superfund” legislation enacted by the Congress of the United States in 19802 overlap partially but not entirely. In the area of overlap, both statutes create funds to defray the costs of responding to environmental damage caused by the disposal of certain hazardous substances. Even in this area, however, the state and federal funds are not identical, for § 114(c) of the federal statute provides that no person may be required to contribute to any state fund if “the purpose” of the fund is to pay…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Exxon Corp. v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Exxon Corp. v. HuntNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API