Legal Opinion

(PC) Vaden v. Forensic Medical Group

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 11, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02182Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERNEST LEE VADEN, JR., No. 2:24-cv-2182-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a former county inmate currently in state custody, filed this civil rights action 18 pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

without a lawyer. He has requested leave to proceed without paying 19 the full filing fee for this action, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration 20 showing that he cannot afford to pay the entire filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API