Legal Opinion
United States v. James Earl Landers
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 20, 1994No. 93-5872, 93-6363PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.
The defendant-appellant, James Earl Lan-ders (“Landers”), challenged his jury conviction and resultant sentence for conspiracy to possess, with intent to distribute, 4,500 dosage units of dilaudid, 1 a Schedule II controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 812, 841(a)(1), and 846. The appellant additionally contested the revocation, as a consequence of this conviction, of a supervised release term imposed in an earlier prosecution.
In April 1992, Landers and his wife Rose, 2 who resided in Memphis, Tennessee, became targets of a Drug Enforcement Administration…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Gordon PennellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Keith PickettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- United States v. John R. Prince (98-6361), Tony White (98-6362)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Luis Salgado (99-5645) Wilfredo Jambu (99-5651)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Benjamin Y. Owusu (98-3356), Larry Latham (98-3847), and Anthony Latham (98-3850)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. JerossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Gregory Wells, M.D. (98-6010) Ronald Lee Dillion (98-6011)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.