Legal Opinion
United States v. Gregory Wells, M.D. (98-6010) Ronald Lee Dillion (98-6011)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 10, 2000No. 98-6010, 98-6011PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-Appellants Gregory Wells, M.D., and Ronald Lee Dillion appeal from their jury convictions on ten counts of narcotics crimes. The convictions all arise from Dr. Wells’s prescriptions for thousands of dosages of controlled substances for the use and benefit of Dillion, a friend and patient. On appeal, Dr. Wells and Dillion raise multiple issues. None of Dr. Wells’s claims have merit, and we AFFIRM his conviction. However, because the district court erred in the manner in which it assessed Dillion’s claim that the government breached his plea agreement, we…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. John Ray Bonds (91-3610) Mark Verdi (91-3609) and Steven Wayne Yee (91-3608)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. James Harrison HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Donovan Spence v. Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, and Commissioner, New York State Department of Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- State v. BethelOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Philecia Barnes v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Paul Corrado (98-2269) Nove Tocco (98-2270) Vito William Giacalone (98-2365)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.