Legal Opinion
Freedman v. Comcast Corp.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 28, 2010No. 435, 2102, September Term, 2008PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatricciani, J.
Appellant, Michael A. Freedman, claimed that appellee, the group of corporate entities known and commonly referred to as “Comcast,” violated the 1997 Maryland Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act, Md.Code (1974, 2006 Repl.Vol.), § 10-402 et seq. of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article (“CJ”). Appellant filed suit in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City and the parties filed several initial pleadings. The circuit court denied appellee’s motion to compel arbitration and dismissed the suit, without prejudice. 1 Appellant twice amended his complaint, and appellee moved again to…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- St. Mary's Medical Center of Evansville, Incorporated v. Disco Aluminum Products Company, Incorporated, N/k/a Luminar Products, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Cain v. Midland Funding, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Rankin v. Brinton Woods of Frankford, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Stewart v. StewartCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- American Bank Holdings, Inc. v. KavanaghCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. v. SibleyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.