Legal Opinion
CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. v. Sibley
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 14, 2016No. Case No. RWT 16-cv-1459PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROGER W. TITUS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
As this Court explained in its Memorandum Opinion filed on July 13, 2016 (ECF No. 38), the Defendant, Montgomery Blair Sibley (“Sibley”), trained and previously licensed as an attorney, was suspended *432from the practice of law by three jurisdictions based on his pursuit of meritless and vexatious litigation. He has not been reinstated by any of these jurisdictions.
In January 2011, Sibley transitioned from selling legal advice to selling used cars when he obtained employment as a sales consultant for CarMax. CarMax terminated Sibley’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- American Express Co. v. Italian Colors RestaurantSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bailey v. Thompson Creek Window CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Bourne v. CVSDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Laura Green v. iMentor, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025