Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Comly

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 5, 2001PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLINS, Judge.

Barry L. Comly appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County (trial court) which held that Comly was not eligible for relief under the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA).1 We affirm.

On November 18, 1998, Comly shot a deer while there was no deer season in effect. On February 2, 1999, following a summary trial, Comly was convicted of violating Section 2307(a) of the Game and Wildlife Code, entitled Unlawful Taking or Possession of Game or Wildlife, 34 Pa.C.S. § 2307(a).2 Subsequently, Comly filed a notice of appeal to the trial court. The trial court found…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AhlbornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Oberneder v. Link Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Pennsylvania Game Commission v. MarichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. DeMarteleire v. Commonwealth, Game CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MaskerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Kline v. Security Guards, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. MaskerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. D. Fetherman v. PennDOTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Fetherman v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API