Legal Opinion

Kinetico, Inc. v. Independent Ohio Nail Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 4, 1984No. 47464 and 47476PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPryatel, J.

Plaintiff-appellee Ki-netico, Incorporated (hereinafter “Kinetico”) filed suit for breach of contract and breach of warranty against two defendants-appellants. Defendant-appellant Industrial Retaining Ring Company (hereinafter “IRR”) is the manufacturer of a certain type of ring used by Kinetico in producing water softeners. Defendant-appellant Independent Ohio Nail Company, d.b.a. Spencer Products Company (hereinafter “Spencer”) was the distributor and seller of this ring to the plaintiff. After a jury trial, Kinetico was awarded $550,000 in damages against both defendants-appellants.

Kinetico…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peter L. Battista, Jr. v. Lebanon Trotting Association, and John J. Carlo, Peter L. Battista, Jr. v. Lebanon Trotting Association, and John J. CarloCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  2. Charles R. Combs Trucking, Inc. v. International Harvester Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Stephan's MacHine & Tool, Inc. v. D & H MacHinery Consultants, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Price Bros. v. WaltersOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Advertisers Exchange, Inc. v. BleichOhio Court of Appeals · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Volunteer Energy Services, Inc. v. Option Energy, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. Rhodes v. Rhodes Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Oakleaf v. Oakleaf & Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. Davis v. Sun Refining & Marketing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Domestic Linen Supply & Laundry Co. v. Kenwood Dealer Group, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API