Legal Opinion

Brandt v. Parke (In Re Foos)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 29, 1997No. 19-05477PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RONALD BARLIANT, Bankruptcy Judge.

The defendant in this adversary proceeding allegedly received a distribution, or as the Trustee describes it, some of the “Fictitious Profits,” from the Debtor’s Ponzi Scheme. The Trustee filed this action to recover approximately $23,900 under § 544(b) 1 and the Illinois Fraudulent Conveyance Act [740 ILCS 160/5(a)(l) ]. The defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that the summons and complaint were not served timely and that the statutes of limitations had expired. For the reasons set forth below, the defendant’s motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Daniel R. Bucknum, Dba Bucknum, Levine & Smith, Debtor. Joe W. Moody, Bernice H. Moody v. Daniel R. Bucknum, Dba Bucknum, Levine & SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Levoy (In Re Levoy)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Kadlecek v. Ferguson (In Re Ferguson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  4. In Re Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stephenson Ex Rel. Estate of MJK Clearing, Inc. v. El-BatrawiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Sears Petroleum & Transport Corporation v. Burgess Construction Services, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
  3. Sullivan v. Thies (In Re Dergance)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
  4. James Stephenson v. Ramy El-BatrawiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API