State v. Schuster
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHUMAKER, Judge.
Appellants in these consolidated appeals challenge the district court’s refusal to prohibit the use of North Dakota impaired driving convictions to enhance Minnesota impaired driving offenses. Because the prior convictions arise from violations of appellants’ Minnesota constitutional rights, the prior convictions cannot be used to enhance Minnesota offenses, and we reverse.
FACTS
The Minnesota Impaired Driving Code presents a scheme of penalties and enhanced penalties for driving, operating, or being in physical control of a motor vehicle while impaired from alcohol or…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Kuntz v. State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.