Legal Opinion

Scott v. Norris

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 1892No. 639PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Union Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, C. J.

This action was on a note executed by the appellees to the appellant. The appellees answered by a plea in abatement, alleging that the action was prematurely brought, the note not being due. There was a demurrer to the plea which was overruled by the court, whereupon the appellant filed a reply in two paragraphs, one of which was the general denial and the other a plea of former adjudication. To the latter paragraph a demurrer was sustained, and the appellant refusing to plead further the case made upon the answer in abatement and the denial thereto was submitted to a jury, who returned a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. King v. Enterprise InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Mason v. MasonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Roszell v. RoszellIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Drake v. Pueblo National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  2. Norris v. ScottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Pilotte v. BrummettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Pilotte v. BrummettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API