Continental Casualty Co. v. Enco Associates, Inc.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtD. F. Walsh, J.
This is a declaratory judgment action filed to determine the respective rights of parties under a contract of insurance. The plain tiff, Continental Casualty Company (hereafter "Continental”) appeals as of right from the entry of a summary judgment on the ground that there was no genuine issue of a material fact, GCR 1963, 117.2(3).
The facts are largely undisputed by the parties. It is basically the legal effect of their conduct which is at issue here. Continental had issued an architects-engineers professional liability policy to Eneo Associates, Inc. (hereafter "Eneo”) providing liability…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Allen v. Board of State AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Cora v. PattersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Central Wholesale Co. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by5 opinions
- Zuckerman v. National Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Pinckney Community Schools v. Continental Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Civic Associates, Inc. v. Security Insurance Co. of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Pinckney Community Schools v. Continental Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Pinckney Community Schools v. Continental Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995