Legal Opinion

Chosewood v. Byars

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 5, 1947No. 15703PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Justice.

In his amended motion for new trial, the plaintiff in error sets out five speciál grounds. He has argued and insisted upon only three questions. We deal with the case as presented by the plaintiff in error. We think that the questions argued by counsel will decide all legal questions raised.

The first insistence is that the general demurrer should have been sustained, and the plaintiff in the court below should not have recovered, for the reason that the dates for the exercise of the option to purchase had expired under the terms of both of the lease agreements set out in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Slater v. KimbroSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Hamby & Toomer v. Georgia Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Walker v. WadleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Citizens Oil Company Inc. v. HeadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sisco v. RotenbergSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL CORPORATION v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  3. Kutkowski v. Princeville Prince Golf Course, LLCHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Hennessey v. PriceNevada Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API