Legal Opinion
Main v. Main
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 21, 1989No. 6689PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment rendered in this dissolution of marriage action. He claims that the trial court erred (1) in permitting testimony concerning the plaintiffs self-serving declarations, (2) in permitting testimony from the plaintiffs psychologist, (3) in receiving posttrial evidence from the plaintiff, and (4) in making various financial orders. We find error in part.
The following facts are relevant to the resolution of this appeal. The parties were married on July 6,1963, and have one minor child who was born on August 13, 1971.
The plaintiff instituted this dissolution…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gallo v. GalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Leo v. LeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Shelnitz v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- McPhee v. McPheeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Texaco, Inc. v. GolartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wendt v. WendtConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Maturo v. MaturoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Chouinard v. MarjaniConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- In re Soncheray H.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Hernandez v. DawsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.