Hudson v. State

PHIPPS, Presiding Judge.

Anthony Rudyard Hudson was charged with having committed criminal trespass, by entering the premises of another person after he *703had received notice that such entry was forbidden.1 A jury returned a guilty verdict, and a judgment of conviction was entered thereon. In this appeal, Hudson challenges the admission of certain evidence and the propriety of a jury instruction. We affirm.

The state presented the following evidence at trial. The premises at issue was a hair salon that was owned and operated by a woman with whom Hudson had fathered a child out of wedlock. The…