State v. Coleman
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtStoughton, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction rendered following his pleas of guilty to twenty of twenty-six counts in nine separate informations. The pleas were made under the doctrine of the Alford1 case. Before he was sentenced, the defendant moved to withdraw his pleas. The motion was denied except as to one count and sentence was imposed.
The defendant claims (1) that his pleas were not made knowingly and voluntarily because the presiding judge had advised him incorrectly as to the mandatory minimum sentences for the crimes charged, (2) that participation by the judge in the plea…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- D'Amico v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. DomianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. ColemanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- State v. GambleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.