Searles v. . Gebbie
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered ¡November 14, 1906, which reversed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint. The following questions were certified: ' “First. Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the demurring defendants ? “ Second.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered ¡November 14, 1906, which reversed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint. The following questions were certified: ' “First. Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the demurring defendants ? “ Second. Are several causes of action improperly united in said complaint \ ”
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs; first question answered in the negative, second in the affirmative ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Ford v. SnookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- In re the Estate of BoothNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
- Brown v. Deposit National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1925
- Homan v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- In re the Estate of WolfeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.