Legal Opinion
Brown v. Deposit National Bank
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 22, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rhodes, J.:
Plaintiff brings this action in equity for an accounting. The defendant the Deposit National Bank was engaged in business at Deposit, N. Y., and Knapp Brothers, a copartnership of Deposit, N. Y., held shares of stock in said bank. While the number of shares owned by said copartnership and the individual members thereof is disputed, it appears that the copartnership held, or controlled for voting purposes, at least 592 shares. Knapp Brothers and the individual members thereof were adjudicated bankrupt on or about the 12th day of April, 1909.
By the National Bank Act (U. S. R. S. §…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Niles v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Planten v. National Nassau BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Planten v. . EarlNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Le Roy v. Globe InsuranceNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
- Searles v. GebbieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Holland Banking Co. v. Continental Nat. Bank of Jackson CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1930
- National Bank of Commerce v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930
- Silberfeld v. Swiss Bank Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1944
- Gutman v. BrandenNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- Silber v. Clarence Rainess & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.