Legal Opinion

Williams v. Harvey

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1931No. 6,861PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This is an appeal from a judgment by default, entered in favor of plaintiff and against the defendants after defendants’ general and special demurrer to the amended complaint was overruled.

The determinative question presented is whether the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The following facts appear from the amended complaint: Plaintiff owns certain inclosed lands in Judith Basin county customarily used by him a short period each summer on which to feed sheep. He also owns land in Wheatland county on which he maintains his residence. On the first Monday in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Arkadelphia Milling Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Erskine v. Van ArsdaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Stadler v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Redfield v. BartelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. State Tax Commission v. United Verde Extension Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lakefront Realty Corp. v. LorenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State Ex Rel. Goza v. District Court of Eleventh Judicial Dist.Montana Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Christofferson v. Chouteau CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. American Oil Company v. NeillIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Associated Hospital Service, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API