Legal Opinion

O'Keefe v. Van Boening

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 30, 1996No. 94-35845PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:

A state prisoner sued various prison officials pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988), alleging that the prison’s mail policy violated his First Amendment right to seek redress for grievances. Under the prison’s mail poli-*323ey, “legal mail,” although broadly defined, does not include grievances sent by prisoners to some state agencies or officials. Consequently, for the purpose of inspecting for contraband, evidence of criminal activity, or threats to prison security, prison mailroom employees can open and read these grievances and any responses, outside the presence of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Thornburgh v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2987, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4967 Timothy Dale O'Keefe v. Ronald Van Boening, Wsp Associate Superintendent James Spalding, Director Dop Carol A. Murphy, Assistant Attorney General of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Crossroads Partners v. Utah Crossing, Ltd., and Hale, Lane, Peek, Dennison and HowardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API