United States v. Oscar Trevino
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, Circuit Judge:
Appellant, a Postal Service employee, was convicted of violating Title 18, U.S. C.A. § 1709. This statute delineates two offenses. The question presented is *75whether appellant was charged with an offense under the statute. We reverse and remand, holding that the indictment failed to state an offense.
The indictment was challenged prior to trial as required by Rule 12(b)(2), F.R.Crim.P.1 Moreover, under the terms of the rule, an indictment may be challenged at any time if no offense is charged in the indictment. Walker v. United States, 5 Cir., 1965, 342 F.2d 22, 26; United…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Robert Leonard LucarzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Henry Walker, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. William Edward Beard, United States of America v. Harold GarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Hall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Bernhardt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Yvonne SayklayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Calvin A. SelwynCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Ex parte GarciaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- United States v. MacKDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
- United States v. Calvin A. SelwynCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.