Legal Opinion

Bernhardt v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 27, 1948No. 10652, 10653PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellants complain of their conviction and sentence upon two informations, the first charging them with violating 18 U.S.C.A. § 641, in stealing, embezzling or knowingly applying to their own use certain property furnished for the use of the military or naval service of the| United States, and the second charging violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 201, in paying $400 to one Edwin Harry Gust, an employee of the United States, with the intent to influence his decision or action in a matter within his jurisdiction, thereby making an opportunity for the commission of a fi-aud upon the United States.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fong Haw Tan v. PhelanSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. BirdsallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Matheson's Admin. v. Grant's Admin.Supreme Court of the United States · 1844
  4. Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  5. Shiflett v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. John Sydney Cook, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Charles Edward Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  3. United States v. DaigleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957
  4. State v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
  5. Richard Dudley Helms v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API