Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Lux

California Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1896No. S. F. No. 137PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Mateo County making a monthly allowance to Miranda W. Lux, widow of Charles Lux, deceased, during the settlement of the estate. George H. Buck, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

This is an appeal by tlie next of kin—called generally the German heirs—of Charles Lux, deceased, from an order of the court sitting in probate, made March 22, 1894, allowing Miranda W. Lux, widow of the deceased, for her maintenance $2,500 per month from the thirtieth day of August, 1888, during the progress of the settlement of the estate; and we are asked to reverse the order, upon the grounds that the allowance was for too large an amount, and that she was not entitled to any allowance at all.

We will not discuss at length the question whether the court below abused its discretion by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Estate of BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. In Re the Estate of NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Estate of HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. In Re Estate of CowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API