Padro v. Knobloch
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSidney A. Fine, J.
Defendant has moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and plaintiffs have requested summary judgment in their favor. No common-law liability of defendant has been established, since the car, at the time of the accident, was being operated by a thief and not with the consent, express or implied, of defendant. However, plaintiffs allege that the key had been left in the ignition switch, with the doors to the car unlocked and the car unattended. Defendant states that the keys to the car were left, not in the ignition switch, but on the front seat. The facts relating to this issue…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Woodmere Academy v. MoskowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
3Cited by9 opinions
- Guaspari v. GorskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Call v. HuffmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Tyndall v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1969
- General Accident Group v. NoonanNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- Catanese v. WhitlowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.