Legal Opinion
Arlene B. Singer v. Shannon & Luchs Company
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 3, 1989No. 87-7053PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion PER CURIAM.
ORDER
Upon consideration of appellants’ Petition for Rehearing it is
ORDERED, by the court, that the petition is denied, as is more fully set forth in the opinion of the Court filed herein this date.
2Per curiam
Plaintiff-appellants, Arlene B. Singer and Joel D. Joseph, have petitioned for rehearing of our order granting Shannon & Luchs’s motion for attorneys’ fees. Their objection is that Shannon & Luchs’s motion was filed nearly a year after our unpublished judgment in its favor and was therefore in violation of Fed.R.App.P. 39’s requirement that a bill of costs thereunder be filed…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Morton M. Hill, Jr. v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Sun Ship, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. Matson Navigation Co., and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Alabama Power Company v. Anne M. Gorsuch, as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Sierra Club, Intervenors.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Hewitt v. City of StantonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- District No. 8, International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Clearing, Division of U.S. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Azizian v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Adsani v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Adsani v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Family Pac v. Robert FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- South Star Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.