Legal Opinion

Family Pac v. Robert Ferguson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 19, 2014No. 12-35640PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FISHER, Circuit Judge:

Addressing an issue of first impression in this circuit, we hold that the term “costs” under Rule 39 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure does not include attorney’s fees recoverable as part of costs under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and similar statutes. The district court therefore properly concluded that the statement in our previous opinion that “[ejach party shall bear its own costs of appeal,” Family PAC v. McKenna, 685 F.3d 800, 814 (9th Cir.2012), did not preclude Family PAC, as prevailing party, from obtaining an award of appellate attorney’s fees under §…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. John S. Terket v. Harold LundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hines v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  2. Dowd v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
  3. Thorncreek Apartments I, LLC v. Village of Park ForestDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  4. Erickson Productions Inc v. Kraig R KastDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  5. Erickson Productions Inc v. Kraig R KastDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API