Legal Opinion

Beth-Elkhorn Corp. v. McFall

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 9, 1967PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAY Commissioner.

This is an appeal from a judgment confirming an order of the Workmen’s Com*858pensation Board which required appellant employer to reimburse the appellee employee for medical expenses he allegedly incurred.

The employee had prosecuted a claim for workmen’s compensation against appellant and the Subsequent Claim Fund. On June 1, 1964, the Board entered an order reciting that the employee recover compensation of the defendant Subsequent Claim Fund, and also recover of “said defendant” medical, surgical and hospital expenses. (This latter part of the order was doubtless erroneous.)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hysteam Coal Corporation v. IngramCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  2. Edgemont Fuel Co. v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Princess Elkhorn Coal Co. v. OusleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Slone v. R & S MINING, INC.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Wheatley v. Bryant Auto ServiceKentucky Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Keefe v. O. K. Precision Tool & Die Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
  4. Zeigler Coal Co. v. HopsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986
  5. Murray Hospital Ass'n v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API