Legal Opinion

Zeigler Coal Co. v. Hopson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided August 15, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUDGEL, Judge:

The principal issue in this appeal is whether the workers’ compensation board may validly reopen a claim which was previously dismissed without prejudice. The court below adjudged that it could. We agree. Hence, we affirm.

Appellee Edward Hopson, Jr. was employed by appellant Zeigler Coal Company (Zeigler) until December 22,1978. On June 25, 1979, Hopson filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits against Zeigler, alleging that he was totally disabled due to having contracted the disease of coal workers’ pneumoconiosis. Zeigler notified Hop-son, however, that it would resist…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stambaugh v. Cedar Creek Mining CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
  2. Young v. Charles F. Trivette Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  3. Beth-Elkhorn Corp. v. McFallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967
  4. Blue Diamond Coal Co. v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1956
  5. Reynolds v. Justice Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kendrick v. Bailey Vault Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1997
  2. Basin Energy Co. v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API