Zeigler Coal Co. v. Hopson
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
GUDGEL, Judge:
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the workers’ compensation board may validly reopen a claim which was previously dismissed without prejudice. The court below adjudged that it could. We agree. Hence, we affirm.
Appellee Edward Hopson, Jr. was employed by appellant Zeigler Coal Company (Zeigler) until December 22,1978. On June 25, 1979, Hopson filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits against Zeigler, alleging that he was totally disabled due to having contracted the disease of coal workers’ pneumoconiosis. Zeigler notified Hop-son, however, that it would resist…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stambaugh v. Cedar Creek Mining CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
- Young v. Charles F. Trivette Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- Beth-Elkhorn Corp. v. McFallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967
- Blue Diamond Coal Co. v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1956
- Reynolds v. Justice Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kendrick v. Bailey Vault Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1997
- Basin Energy Co. v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2014