Loppnow v. Bielik
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
NEUBAUER, PJ.
¶ 1. Kalvin Loppnow appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Steven Bielik. The trial court found that Loppnow failed to exercise reasonable diligence pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 801.11(1)(c) (2007-08) 1 in his attempts to serve process on Bielik in the state of Florida. The trial court ordered Loppnow's action against Bielik dismissed with prejudice. We conclude that the trial court erred in its determination. The undisputed facts of record on summary judgment demonstrate that Loppnow exercised reasonable diligence in attempting to serve Bielik. We reverse the trial court's…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- West v. WestWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Haselow v. GauthierCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- Welty v. HeggyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Craig Cunningham v. Michael MontesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- John Marion Lattimore, III v. Daniel Withee, Officer Roettger, and City of MiddletonDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2026
- Kolcu v. Verizon Communications IncDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023