Chatmon v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human Services
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
Where a statute provides an effective administrative remedy, that remedy must be exhausted before recourse may be had to the courts. See Affordable Care, Inc. v. N.C. State Bd. of Dental Exam’rs, 153 N.C. App. 527, 532-33, 571 S.E.2d 52, 57 (2002). In this case, Plaintiff appealed to Superior Court seeking (1) a Declaratory Judgment that the Work First Manual violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and (2) Judicial Review of the Final Agency Decision reducing her Work First Family assistance benefits. We dismiss Petitioner’s appeal from the denial of Declaratory…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Jay Lawrence Halperin v. Abacus Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Bonita McDonald v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare, Polk CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Presnell v. PellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Amanini v. N.C. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Meza v. Division of Social ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- Meza v. Division of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Chatmon v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICESSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- Chatmon v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICESSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- Abrons Family Practice & Urgent Care v. N.C. Dep't Health & Human Servs.North Carolina Business Court · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.