Budget Rent a Car Corp. v. Harvey Kidd Automotive
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BUCKLO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Budget Rent A Car Corporation and Ryder TRS, Inc. (collectively “Budget”) move for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) against defendants Harvey Kidd Automotive and Lilly Kidd (collectively “Kidd”). Budget, a truck rental business, argues that Kidd entered into a dealership agreement with Budget that contained a non-compete agreement, and that Kidd subsequently terminated the dealership agreement and became a dealer for a competing truck rental business. Budget seeks a TRO essentially to enforce the non-compete agreement, which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cooper v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- U-Haul Co. of Central Illinois v. HindahlAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- General Electric Co., a Corporation v. American Wholesale Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- Outsource International, Incorporated v. George Barton and Barton's Staffing Solutions, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Alma-Leo U.S.A., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Foster v. GhoshDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- AssuredPartners of Missouri, LLC v. Edgewood Partners Insurance Center, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2025
- Madden v. Amazon.com Services LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023