Legal Opinion

Lincoln Drug Co. v. Harman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1945No. 31955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is an action to recover $1,386.78 from Earl N. Harman, James A. Donaldson and Georgia Donaldson for the value of merchandise alleged to have been lost in the process *355of delivering it from the Eastman Kodak Company’s warehouse in Chicago, Illinois, to the Lincoln Drug Company in Lincoln, Nebraska. The trial court found that negligence was not established, dismissed the action as to the Donald-sons and entered judgment against Harman for the amount claimed on the theory that he was a common carrier. From this judgment defendant Harman appeals.

The record shows that on August 1, 1937, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Galveston Wharf Co. v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Max Biederman, Inc. v. HendersonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Beatrice Creamery Co. v. FisherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  4. Klein v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Langendorf Clothing Co. v. FaraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fisher Corp. v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. M.I.S. Engineering v. U.S. Express Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API