Legal Opinion
M.I.S. Engineering v. U.S. Express Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided June 26, 2006No. 4:06CV3074PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KOPF, District Judge.
On November 21, 2002, the plaintiff, M.I.S. Engineering (“M.I.S.”), hired the defendant, U.S. Express Enterprises, Inc. (“U.S-Xpress”), 1 to transport equipment from Buffalo, Minnesota, to Lincoln, Nebraska. M.I.S. alleges that the equipment was extensively damaged when it arrived in Lincoln the next day. M.I.S. submitted a claim for the alleged damages to U.S. Xpress on November 26, 2002, but the claim was denied on January 7, 2003. Over three years later, on February 8, 2006, M.I.S. filed suit in the District Court of Lancaster County, Nebraska,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Beneficial National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Jones v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Daybreak Express, Inc. v. Lexington Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Beemac Trucking, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2013
- Daybreak Express, Inc v. Lexington Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Burr Computer Environments, Inc. and J. Supor & Sons Trucking & Rigging Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- Daybreak Express, Inc. v. Lexington Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- KOTICK v. ATLAS VAN LINES INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2019