Corbett v. Hilton Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
"WiNBORNE, J.
Appellants on this appeal bring into question the correctness of the ruling of the trial court in overruling their demurrer, and in continuing the restraining order, as modified, until the final hearing.
When the sufficiency of a pleading is tested upon challenge by demurrer, the truth of the allegations of fact contained therein, and ordinarily relevant inferences of fact, necessarily deducihle therefrom, are admitted. Ballinger v. Thomas, 195 N. C., 517, 142 S. E., 761; Spake v. Pearlman, 222 N. C., 62, 21 S. E. (2d), 881; Dickensheets v. Taylor, ante, 570.
Both the statute, C.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ballinger v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Insurance Co. v. . McCrawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Cotton Mills v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Spake v. . PearlmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
3Cited by1 opinion
- McCampbell v. Valdese Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950