Legal Opinion

Douthitt v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 12, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Norris. Fannin superior court. February 18, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.

1. Upon proof of injury to a passenger of a railroad company by the running of its locomotives, cars, or other machinery, or by any person in its employment and service, the law raises a presumption that the injury was caused by the negligence of the company.(a) Where an injury to a passenger is proved to have been thus caused, this presumption will not be rebutted by the company showing that it exercised on.lv ordinary care and diligence; as railroad companies are *352bound, to use extraordinary care and diligence for the safety of passengers. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Ry. Co. v. Miller, 95 Ga. 738…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. GillelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Sanders v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. DeasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  2. Battey v. Savannah Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  3. Battey v. Savannah Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API