Montanez v. Cass
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a summary judgment granted defendants. It arose out of an alleged claim for damages caused by the negligence of the defendants during the attempted removal of a secondary electric system by Gary Electric by whom plaintiff was employed. We reverse.
A. Positions of Parties Defendant
1. Wolfson Oil Company
Defendant Wolfson Oil Company drilled an oil well several miles south of Eunice, New Mexico, close to the Texas state line. On February 8, 1969, the well came into production. Wolfson employed defendant Cass-Fitts Electric Company (Cass) to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hader v. Coplay Cement Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- International Harvester Co. v. SartainCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
- Woolen v. Aerojet General CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Saiz Ex Rel. Estate of Saiz v. Belen School DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- New Mexico Electric Service Co. v. MontanezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- Savinsky v. Bromley Group, Ltd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Chavez v. County of BernalilloDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Saul E. Bramer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.