Legal Opinion

Kentucky-Pennsylvania Oil & Gas Corp. v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided January 31, 1933PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Couet by

Stanley, Oommissionee

Reversing.

The question on this appeal is whether the appellant, a corporation, is bound by an act of a purported agent in accepting a proposition to buy and exchange certain interests in oil leases. The relief sought and granted was specific performance by the appellant of that contract, which had been repudiated by the company. There is no claim of express authority. The ease is rested upon an agency arising or implied from the conduct and attitude of the company in relation to previous activities of the person assuming to represent it.

The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Owings v. HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  2. Elk Valley Coal Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Caddy Oil Co. v. SommerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  4. McKnight v. Broadway Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Short v. Metz Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mill Street Church of Christ v. HoganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1990
  2. Calhoun v. EvermanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
  3. BancoKentucky Co.'s Receiver v. National Bank of Kentucky's ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  4. Cumnock-Reed Co. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  5. Embry v. LongCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API