Auzerais v. Naglee
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1DissentThornton, J.
— I dissent. The motion of the defendant for a further and more particular copy of the account sued on was denied by the court below, “ on the ground that in an action on an account stated no account need be furnished under the law.”
The statute on this subject is section 454, Code of Civil Procedure:—
“It is not necessary for a party to set forth in a pleading the items of an account therein alleged, but he must deliver to the adverse party, within five days after a demand thereof in writing, a copy of the account, or be precluded from giving evidence thereof. The court or judge thereof may…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Terry v. SicklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Providence Tool Co. v. PraderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Starkweather v. KittleNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Bowman v. EarleThe Superior Court of New York City · 1854
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.