Legal Opinion · Dissent

Auzerais v. Naglee

California Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1887No. 8798Published

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1DissentThornton, J.

— I dissent. The motion of the defendant for a further and more particular copy of the account sued on was denied by the court below, “ on the ground that in an action on an account stated no account need be furnished under the law.”

The statute on this subject is section 454, Code of Civil Procedure:—

“It is not necessary for a party to set forth in a pleading the items of an account therein alleged, but he must deliver to the adverse party, within five days after a demand thereof in writing, a copy of the account, or be precluded from giving evidence thereof. The court or judge thereof may…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  2. Terry v. SicklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Providence Tool Co. v. PraderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Starkweather v. KittleNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  5. Bowman v. EarleThe Superior Court of New York City · 1854

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API