Legal Opinion

Firestone v. Claycombe & King

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 31, 1994No. 05-92-01738-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MALONEY, Justice.

Myma Firestone, Russell A. Firestone III and the Russell Firestone III Trust (collectively the Firestones) sued the law firm of Claycombe & King and Bruce Claycombe (collectively Claycombe) for legal malpractice. The Firestones appeal the trial court’s order “freezing” discovery and subsequent refusal to allow them to supplement then-discovery responses. Because the rules of civil procedure do not authorize this “freeze” order, we reverse.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The trial court set this case for trial on March 11th. Its scheduling notice ordered the parties to complete…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. First Dallas Petroleum, Inc. v. Hawkins, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  3. Zep Manufacturing Co. v. Anthony, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  4. General Electric Co. v. Salinas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
  5. Brighton Square Publishing, Inc. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. KC Roofing Co., Inc. v. Abundis, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
  2. Helfand v. Coane, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
  3. Suzanna L. Carlson and Travelers Indemnity Company of Rhode Island v. William P. Taylor, M.D. Austin Back Clinic Capital Radiology Association J. Neil Rutledge, M.D.Richard D. Tallman, M.D. And Austin Diagnostic Clinic, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994
  4. in Re Eurecat US, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  5. in Re Eurecat US, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API